tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1691893524480808637.post3676579890390748669..comments2014-08-26T05:02:21.385+01:00Comments on Virtually Insane?: ESX IOPs - This is NOT a HyperV bash!Daniel Easonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09989008409906349470noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1691893524480808637.post-64297278875415176912009-05-28T20:40:39.564+01:002009-05-28T20:40:39.564+01:00Can you reverse the comparison servers and test ag...Can you reverse the comparison servers and test again? That is put Hyper-V on the 580 with the DAS and the ESX on the SAN with the other variables the same as now.Linusnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1691893524480808637.post-65728083514652704352009-05-26T23:28:38.514+01:002009-05-26T23:28:38.514+01:00@Dan, that's really funny... so on your "sh1tpit s...@Dan, that's really funny... so on your "sh1tpit server" you get better results than an optimised Hyper-V configuration? Can you add a column for the physical results, perhaps include some specs for them? Or should I stop being lazy and follow the link back the M$ site... ;-)Steve Chambershttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10382328529822408184noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1691893524480808637.post-68962552807398000072009-05-26T22:38:18.803+01:002009-05-26T22:38:18.803+01:00Anonymous,
I don't understand what makes you thin...Anonymous,<br /><br />I don't understand what makes you think that this was an Apples for Apples comparison, i'd say it just highlights the obvious about ESX performance on a lame underoptimised system.<br /><br />Are you basically saying an ESX VM will show lower IOmeter results when it is run on a similar highly optimised storage configuration as per used to obtain the published results for HyperV?Daniel Easonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09989008409906349470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1691893524480808637.post-20561794103015461332009-05-26T18:03:59.997+01:002009-05-26T18:03:59.997+01:00Dan, You compared to completely different disk sub...Dan, You compared to completely different disk subsystems. SAN vs DAS as well as two different RAID stripes. This isn't even close to an apples vs. apples comparison. Kind of like an apples to Buick comparison.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com